- Face of Beauty CEO Patience Egbor accused her ex-husband of causing her downfall and abandoning their children.
- Mr. Peter, her ex-husband, responded through a proxy, neither confirming nor refuting the allegations.
- He stressed his commitment to keeping family matters private and defended himself against the claim of abandonment.
- Mr. Peter hinted at having evidence to support his position but refrained from disclosing it.
Mr. Peter, the former husband of Patience Egbor, the estranged CEO of Face of Beauty, has issued a response to allegations made against him.
Patience Egbor had previously accused her ex-husband of causing her downfall and leaving her and their children during a difficult period in her life.
In his response, Mr. Peter neither confirmed nor refuted the allegations but emphasized that he did not believe in airing family matters on social media.
He addressed the specific claim of abandoning their children, asserting that it was untrue.
Mr. Peter’s statement, relayed through a proxy, emphasized his commitment to maintaining the privacy and dignity of his family, particularly their children.
He refused to engage in online disputes, stating, “At the end of the day, I’ll never be seen doing online dragging with an ex I was once married to. I have too much respect for my children and for the union of wedlock that brought them into this earth.”
Furthermore, he urged restraint and discretion, discouraging the public from making judgments based on a one-sided account of events, insisting that there are always two sides to every story.
Mr. Peter expressed his concern about the potential impact on their children and underlined his commitment to protecting them from public scrutiny.
Mr. Peter also hinted at having evidence to support his position but clarified that he had no intention of disclosing it to the public.
He concluded by thanking those who have supported him and reiterated his devotion to his children.
He wrote;
“At the end of the day, I’ll never been seen doing online dragging with an ex i was once married to. I have too much respect for my children and for the union of wedlock that brought them into this earth.
So for these reasons. I will not tarnish, debunk, or try to defend anything to any online in-laws that weren’t there during the course of a 5 year marriage where lots of events transpired indoors to now know better because of a one sided story being put out. Logically there’s always two sides to every story.
The Internet never forgets and my kids will never grow up to see me dragging the mom online to gain sympathy that I didn’t ask for. I’ll only strongly advise you to refrain from saying I abandoned my kids, leaving a relationship that failed due to lots of reasons best known to the participants of the relationship doesn’t mean I abandoned you or my kids and you know I have endless receipts for that, which will never be published.
The protection and covering of my kids comes first before anything else even above my own self. So kindly refrain from putting my kids out there for online vultures, you know their daddy never abandoned them. Thanks.”
See below;
