Compendium of geothermal bit behavior may help drive down drilling time

Celebrity Gig
Sandia National Laboratories mechanical engineers David Raymond, left, and Melanie Schneider pose in Sandia’s Hard Rock Drilling Facility with a polycrystalline diamond compact bit. They recently completed an analysis on bit performance for geothermal well drilling. Credit: Craig Fritz

In golf, a great caddie helps tune a professional golfer’s performance, matching their skill, choice of club and type of swing to the course and weather conditions.

A recent analysis of drilling records from the Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy by Sandia National Laboratories researchers aims to provide this level of guidance to the art of selecting the right drill bit for geothermal well drilling, based on location and depth, to reduce drilling costs. FORGE is a field laboratory in southwestern Utah, dedicated to testing geothermal technologies to reduce risks and accelerate commercial viability.

Geothermal power plants offer the advantage of providing clean electricity, all day every day, regardless of weather conditions, thus balancing intermittent renewable energy sources such as solar panels and wind farms. However, the high startup costs for finding suitable locations and drilling the necessary wells have hindered commercial development. The FORGE project, alongside the Sandia analysis, aims to improve drill bit performance in the challenging conditions of geothermal sites and reduce drilling costs.

“At the FORGE site, a number of wells were drilled to depths of approximately 10,000 feet, and they were largely drilled by polycrystalline diamond compact bits,” said David Raymond, a Sandia mechanical engineer and leader of the analysis. “This is one of the largest applications of diamond bits for geothermal drilling in their 40-year history. We produced a compendium of all the drill bits used and how they performed.”

The Sandia research team, led by Raymond, analyzed drill rig data from the most recent wells drilled at the FORGE site, looking at the response data and post-operation photos of each polycrystalline diamond compact bit. The results of this analysis were recently shared with the geothermal community. Polycrystalline diamond compact bits have proven to be more cost-effective than roller bits for oil and gas drilling. This compendium could help do the same for geothermal drilling.

READ ALSO:  A deep learning framework for efficiently solving reaction-transport equations in porous media

Analysis for better bits

At the University of Utah-managed FORGE site, four wells were drilled for injection, production and monitoring, primarily using polycrystalline diamond compact bits. These bits use the strength of lab-made diamonds in the form of disc-shaped cutters. Many of these cutters are embedded into the bit in a specific arrangement designed to best cut the rock. The industrial diamonds in these bits are tiny, grown in a lab for strength rather than aesthetics.

“Two things afforded FORGE the ability to drill with these advanced diamond bits,” said Doug Blankenship, a Sandia geothermal expert on detail with DOE’s Geothermal Technologies Office as a senior adviser. “One is the advanced technology that the bit companies have developed so that the bits are more capable of drilling in hot, hard rock. Two is the approach to running these bits that Fred Dupriest and Sam Noynaert from Texas A&M brought to the drilling program.”

Raymond and his team, which includes mechanical engineer Melanie Schneider, looked at the daily reports from the FORGE site. They collected four key parameters—the force applied to the drill bit by the rig, the rotation speed set by operators, the drilling speed, and the power needed to achieve that speed—and inserted those numbers into a computer model. They used the algorithm to model the interaction between the drill bit and the rock, comparing that with the response of a single standardized diamond cutter.







Credit: Ruth Frank

The Sandia team also looked at the cost constraints, the balance between drilling speed and distance drilled and how that plays into the cost per foot drilled by each bit. One of the leading costs in geothermal well drilling is the daily expense of renting a drill rig, Raymond said. But that doesn’t mean drilling faster is always the most cost-effective solution, Schneider said. Depending on the depth already drilled and the time taken to get a fresh bit to the bottom of the well, a slower, steadier approach may be more cost effective, Raymond added.

READ ALSO:  Researchers propose hydrogen storage using existing infrastructure in lakes and reservoirs

“A big cost is truly how long it takes to get in and out of the hole when you’re at depth,” Schneider said. “A key take-away from our reporting is it’s not necessarily about going fast or with more force; it’s about trying to extend the bit’s life and getting the most out of each one. We’re already seeing a huge improvement in drilling performance throughout the course of the four wells at FORGE.”

History of diamond bits

In the early 1980s, on the heels of two oil crises and the advent of synthetic diamond manufacturing, research at Sandia took place to develop diamond-based bits for drilling in the hot, hard rock of geothermal systems, Raymond said.

Polycrystalline diamond compact bits are made of many diamond cutters embedded into the bit in a proprietary configuration. Each cutter is a disc of lab-made diamond, sometimes less than 1/16-inch thick, bonded to a tungsten-carbide stud.

More than 40 years ago, Sandia researchers, led by David Glowka, tested diamond cutters from various manufacturers in the lab, measuring the forces required to scratch rock depending on the cutting angle and other parameters, Blankenship said. Data from these experiments were fed into a computer model that allowed for the simulation of forces on any drill bit design, Raymond said. This code was publicly released and provided to drill bit companies to inform the design of cutters on their bits, which was instrumental in catalyzing the industry, Blankenship said.

Since then, diamond bits have been used by the oil and gas industry due to their durability and faster drilling compared to roller bits, Raymond said. However, early generations of diamond bits wore out too fast in the hard rock and high temperatures of geothermal sites, he added. Another challenge of drilling in geothermal sites is the rock often contains fractures, Blankenship said, likening hitting these fractures to striking an unexpected pothole on a bicycle: the best-case scenario is a jolt that doesn’t cause damage.

READ ALSO:  Stock investors lose N3.28tn in three months

Sandia has continued refining diamond bits for geothermal drilling over the years, including computational modeling of specific vibrations that can occur in hard rocks that can cause the drill bit to bounce and break, Raymond said. Sandia also participated in field tests of diagnostics to improve diamond bit usage in extremely hard rock.

Raymond hopes this compendium of bit performance at the FORGE site will help bit manufacturers in designing even better performing bits and assist geothermal well drillers in selecting the best bits for their conditions. Both should help reduce startup costs for steady, clean electricity-producing geothermal power plants.

“It’s been a long road getting to this point where polycrystalline diamond compact bits are a viable solution for geothermal drilling,” Raymond said. “It’s not intuitively obvious how you should place the cutters across the bit to balance speed and lifetime, but that is what our analysis has accomplished. There’s an incredible wealth of information here on what worked and what didn’t work on these synthetic diamond bits.”

More information:
David Raymond et al, Analysis of Rig Parameter Data Using Drilling Process Modeling Constraints, Volume 1: Summary of Utah FORGE Wells 16A(78)-32, 56-32, 78B-32 and 16B(78)-32, (2024). DOI: 10.2172/2462933

Provided by
Sandia National Laboratories


Citation:
Compendium of geothermal bit behavior may help drive down drilling time (2024, December 4)
retrieved 4 December 2024
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Categories

Share This Article
Leave a comment